Botswana court issues damning judgment against PwC over delayed Choppies audit



The High Court of Botswana this week handed down a damning judgment against PwC and auditor Rudi Binedell over delays in releasing group audit results that have severely affected the price of Choppies stock.

The judge slammed Binedell who turned out to have delayed the Choppies Enterprises audit report because a job offered to him at Choppies did not materialize.

Take part in lively discussions with the Moneyweb community and gain full access to our market indicators and data tools while supporting quality journalism.

R63/month Where R630/year

SUBSCRIBE NOW

You can to cancel at any time.

Choppies, a Botswana-based supermarket chain with stores throughout the region, is listed on both the Botswana and Johannesburg stock exchanges.

Its two main shareholders – Ram Ottapathu and Farouk Ismail – are suing PwC and Binedell for a combined sum of R 621.8 million for losses on the Botswana Stock Exchange due to the delayed publication of Choppies’ financial results on that exchange, as well as another 416 rand. 680 for the same delay at the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE).

They allege that PwC’s actions caused the loss of more than 75% of the market value of Choppies.

Choppies share price on the JSE

Trading in Choppies shares was suspended on both exchanges in November 2018 due to the late publication of its financial results.

Trading on the JSE resumed in November 2020 after a two-year suspension.

The shares are currently trading at around 80c, a fraction of the all-time high of 730c reached in 2015.

The Botswana court ruling says the Choppies audit was tainted with a job offer – with stock options – which had been extended to head of the audit, Rudi Binedell.

Read:

Botswana retailer Choppies plans to exit South African market [Aug 2019]
Choppies resumes trading on JSE [Nov 2020]

Lead “a problem”

The judgment handed down by Judge Boipuso Tshweneyagae at the High Court of Botswana this week said of Binedell: “…[his] alleged conduct is also a problem ”.

“The allegation is that he was dealing at arm’s length in his audit of the Choppies books because he was offered a job with a large stake as an incentive.

“When this did not materialize, he used his position as Key Lead Auditor to compromise the release of the audit report beyond the September 30, 2018 release deadline.

” At first glance… [his] independence as an impartial and professional auditor was compromised once he engaged in potential employment discussions with Choppies. He should have recused himself from leading the audit.

The judgment sets out PwC’s defense in this case: the audit contract with Choppies never stipulated an absolute deadline of September 30, 2018 for the audit report. PwC and Binedell argued that the deadline depended on Choppies providing draft annual financial statements for audit purposes, which did not happen, and that there was insufficient supporting information to complete the task at hand. time.

Find more details

Ottapathu and Ismail took the case to the Botswana court, seeking “further and better clarification” on the nature and background of the audit conducted by Binedell and PwC.

This was to remove the element of surprise and ambush in litigation, allowing the other party to better prepare their arguments.

“From the audit agreement, the parties had reciprocal obligations,” reads the judgment.

“Choppies had a duty to provide the information. The defendants had an obligation to finalize the audit report within a reasonable time. We could also add that [PwC and Binedell] knowing that Choppies was a listed entity, were aware of the maturities of the Botswana Stock Exchange.

“The complainants [Ottapathu and Ismail] have the right to ask what information has not been provided by them in order to facilitate the audit. This is due to the fact [PwC and Binedell] themselves have asked the question of this failure.

The judge ruled that PwC and Binedell provide the two shareholders with additional details about their defense, saying: “The information requested from the defendants is necessary to enable the plaintiffs to plead and the court to equally assess the issues in dispute. ”

PwC was ordered to pay costs, including lead counsel’s costs.

Test date set

The judge ruled that the case will be tried from May 9 to 20, 2022 and said there will be no relaxation of the specified deadlines for providing the information.

In a written response to the decision, Ottapathu told Moneyweb that the damage to Choppies went beyond the delay in the audit.

Ram Ottapathu, Choppies, PWC

Ram Ottapathu, majority shareholder of Choppies. Image: Moneyweb

“There was no independent spirit behind this audit. Mr. Binedell was engaged in discussions with independent members of the Board of Directors regarding his employment.

“When I didn’t support this, because of the conflict of interest, his behavior changed and all kinds of problems were created,” says Ottapathu.

“The judge felt that he should have recused himself and that ‘When [the job] did not materialize, he used his position as key lead auditor to compromise the publication of the audit report beyond the publication deadline of September 30, 2018 ”.

“The suspension of the Choppies shares resulting from the non-publication of the financial statements damaged the reputation of Choppies as well as my own reputation and that of my co-shareholder, Mr. Farouk Ismail. We estimate that this caused the loss of over 75% of the market value of Choppies. ”

Choppies appointed PwC as auditor in 2018, with Binedell as lead auditor. “However, he was in discussions with independent members of the board about his possible job as CFO of Choppies with a significant financial incentive in stocks if he joined. It was a conflict of interest that I did not support, ”says Ottapathu.

Read:

Choppies in chaos [Aug 2019]
Board vs. CEO in battle for Choppies [Sep 2019]

PwC responds

PwC issued the following response to the judgment: “PwC Botswana confirms that it received a court order asking it to produce information relating to its defense at the start of the legal proceedings. The Order only requests PwC Botswana to produce information and does not constitute a judgment or decision on the merits of the claim.

“PwC Botswana will comply with the order and produce the information at this stage of the proceedings.

“PwC Botswana is confident that the tribunal will eventually find that the delay in finalizing the audit was due to accounting and governance issues within Choppies that came to light during the audit, causing – among others – two independent surveys commissioned by the Board of Directors of Choppies.

“PwC Botswana supports the work it has done and will continue to defend the claim. ”


Previous Nuclear power plant's Hajia Fati reveals galamsey security contract with government
Next Mini budget: stakeholders kept out, says FPCCI